|
If your browser is not immediately re-directed, click here
www.tltgroup.org/blogworkshop/definitions.htm to get to the correct Web-page for : Blogs, Wikis, Feeds: Definitions, etc. |
|||
|
The TLT Group |
|||
|
Blogs, Wikis, Blogs vs. Wikis, RSS & Other Feeds (& Aggregators) [Also see: "Collaborative Software" Overview from Wikipedia - lots of categories] |
|||
|
Blogs vs. Wikis
Blogs
Observation from Steve Gilbert 1. The purposes and style of the text entries on the blog/Webpage 2. The minimal level of Web technical expertise required to launch, modify, or add to the blog/Web page From
"Blogs" by Jay Cross
|
Wikis "…a Wiki is a collaborative website comprised of the collective work of many authors. …" [From http://ssad.bowdoin.edu:8668/space/Definition+of+a+Wiki Created by mphillip. ] What's a Wiki? Half of a Hawaiian term for quick. Any other questions? Ok, a Wiki is a collaborative website comprised of the collective work of many authors. A Wiki allows users to easily upload, edit, and interlink pages. At their best, Wikis foster vibrant online discussion, proceeding in unpredictable, interactive ways. The first wiki was created by Ward Cunningham in 1995. They're increasingly popular with scientists, software engineers, knowledge communities, & others collaborating on projects. ... Notable Wikis Wikipedia: an open content encyclopedia Everything2: a community-edited "microsociety" Why Wiki Works [from http://c2.com/cgi-bin/wiki?WhyWikiWorks] * Any information can be changed or deleted by anyone. Wiki pages represent consensus because it's much easier to delete flames and spam than indulge them. What remains is naturally meaningful. * Anyone can play. This sounds like a recipe for low signal - Wiki gets hit by the great unwashed as often as any other site - but to make an impact on Wiki, you need to generate real content. Anything else will be removed. So anyone can play, but only good players last. * Wiki is not WysiWyg. It's an intelligence test of sorts to be able to edit a Wiki page. It's not rocket science, but it doesn't appeal to the Video Addicts. If it doesn't appeal, they don't participate, which leaves the rest of us to get on with rational discourse. * Wiki doesn't work in real time. People take time to think, sometimes days or weeks, before they follow up some edit. So what people write is generally well-considered. * Wikizens are by nature a pedantic, ornery, and unreasonable bunch. So there's a camaraderie and understanding here we seldom see outside of our professional contacts. So that's it - insecure, indiscriminate, user-hostile, slow, and stocked with difficult, nit-picking people. Any other online community would count each of these as a terrible flaw. Perhaps Wiki works because the other online communities don't. Characteristics of a Wiki [from http://ssad.bowdoin.edu:8668/space/Characteristics+of+a+Wiki Created by mphillip.] What's a Wiki like? Here are some general features of a Wiki that came into play in RAP. This list is loosely based on some of the design principles laid out by Ward Cunningham. *** Open Any user can edit any entry. This includes adding content, turning exiting content into links, or changing content altogether. Involves trust, a sense of collectivity. Organic The structure and content of the site evolves as long as it's used. Users continually define extent of site. Mundane Easily learned coding conventions, for activities like building inside & outside links, formatting text, uploading images (here are the codes we used) Incremental Entries can cite other entries, including pages that have not been written yet. Encourages interconnection. Precise Entry titles encourage focus, highlighting of crucial terms & concepts. Observable Activity within the site can be watched and reviewed by any visitor to the site. (Google searches pointing to this site)
|
||
|
RSS and Other Feeds, and Aggregators RSS and other “feeds,” together with “feed-readers” and “aggregators,” help connect Web authors and their audience. Perhaps to over-simplify: 1. Authors can choose to notify others automatically of new entries or changes to part of a Website or blog by creating a "feed" for that Web element. 2. Others may choose to be notified automatically of those new entries or changes by subscribing to such "feeds." Choosing to receive notification is called "subscribing" to the feed for that part of that Website. Along with notification, the subscriber usually gets some form of direct access to the new or changed material. "Subscribers" can choose to use an intermediate service (“aggregator”) to manage their access to feeds from multiple Web sites and blogs more pleasantly and efficiently. "Aggregators" (and related tools) permit anyone to organize, control, and routinely monitor "feeds" from any selected list of Websites, blogs, etc. Many aggregators can notify the user about new updates and make the titles, excerpts, or full text of those updates directly available to the user. Aggregators may permit the user a variety of choices about how and when to be notified. An aggregator may only work with Websites, etc. that include certain specified kinds of feeds. RSS and similar standard "feeds" hide almost all of the underlying computer programming complexity from both authors and subscribers in the same way that most blogging tools hide from bloggers what is going on about building and modifying Web pages. |
|||
|
Number of visits to this Web page:
[Began count 2/18/2006] |
|
||
|
Learn About TLTG ||
Events & Registration ||
Online Institute ||
Subscriptions ||
Resources ||
Listserv & Forums||
Related Links |
|||
|
TLT-SWG Highly Moderated Listserver Since 1994 Faculty/Professional Development Program |
|||