* RATING: 0 = low; 1 = adequate; 2 = exceptional

 

TEACHING & LEARNING

RATING*

COMMENT

N/A

I      TESTING

 

 

 

a.     item banking

 

 

 

b.     random generation of questions from pool

 

 

 

c.     random value generation for formulas

 

 

 

d.     score reporting on-line

 

 

 

e.     customized feedback for test items

 

 

 

f.     score analysis

 

 

 

g.     variety of formats: fill blanks, multiple choice

 

 

 

h.     timed testing

 

 

 

II    INSTRUCTION

 

 

 

A     PRESENTATION

 

 

 

a.     ease of composition

 

 

 

b.     ease of uploading material

 

 

 

c.     HTML necessary

 

 

 

d.     ease of editing

 

 

 

e.     all data enabled: graphics, video, etc.

 

 

 

f.     variety of display capabilities

 

 

 

g.     hypertext organization with graphics

 

 

 

h.     automated glossary

 

 

 

i.      automated index

 

 

 

j.      search tool

 

 

 

k.     students can annotate material

 

 

 

l.      students can upload presentations

 

 

 

B     PRACTICE

 

 

 

a.     instructor feedback to students

 

 

 

b.     student-to-student feedback (group work)

 

 

 

c.     variable limits for retries possible

 

 

 

d.     branching or hypertext paths

 

 

 

e.     ease of navigation for students

 

 

 

f.     ease of navigation for teachers

 

 

 

g.     student access and progress data monitored

 

 

 

h.     students can self-assess during instruction

 

 

 

i.      ease of course revision

 

 

 

j.      ability to post assignments and retrieve grades

 

 

 

 

C     COMMUNICATION

RATING*

COMMENT

N/A

a.     synchronous: chat room

 

 

 

b.     simultaneous groups possible

 

 

 

c.     asynchronous: e-mail

 

 

 

d.     asynchronous: bulletin board

 

 

 

e.     tracking thread of discussions possible

 

 

 

f.     posting categories of responses possible

 

 

 

g.     webcasting possible

 

 

 

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

 

 

 

III   SERVER

 

 

 

a.     software installation: ease

 

 

 

b.     maintenance: ease—time required

 

 

 

c.     upgrading software: ease

 

 

 

d.     crash recovery

 

 

 

e.     Operating System needed

 

 

 

f.     backup: ease

 

 

 

g.     locally-owned server or outsourcing necessary

 

 

 

h.     number of servers needed

 

 

 

i.      personnel requirements

 

 

 

IV   SECURITY

 

 

 

a.     individual and group enabled

 

 

 

b.     ease of access, not a bottleneck

 

 

 

V     SERVER SUPPORT (troubleshooting)

 

 

 

a.     cost

 

 

 

b.     terms (duration)

 

 

 

c.     24-hour availability

 

 

 

d.     transferability to Help Desk

 

 

 

VI   “HOW-TO” HELP SUPPORT

 

 

 

a.     costs

 

 

 

b.     terms (duration)

 

 

 

c.     24 x 7 availability

 

 

 

d.     transferability to existing Help Desk

 

 

 

VII  USERS’ EQUIPMENT

 

 

 

a.     faculty needs compatible

 

 

 

b.     student needs compatible

 

 

 

VIII      COST

 

 

 

a.     subscription & updates

 

 

 

b.     additional personnel

 

 

 

c.     additional servers, equipment needed

 

 

 

IX   COMPLIANCE

 

 

 

a.     ADA requirements

 

 

 

b.     back office compatibility and enterprise        systems

 

 

 

c.     IMS agreements

 

 

 

X     COUPLING (systemic interdependence)

 

 

 

a.     upgrade requires server upgrade

 

 

 

b.     upgrade triggers additional personnel needs

 

 

 

c.     upgrade triggers software needs

 

 

 

XI   RELATIONSHIP with VENDOR

 

 

 

a.     communication with vendor

 

 

 

 

 

 

This scale in its original and modified form was developed by Henryk Marcinkiewicz. This version is a modification of the one published in

Marcinkiewicz, H. R., & Ross, E. M. (in press). Planning for web-based course management. In. B. Khan (Ed.), Web-Based Training. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

 

The pedagogical content drew from models for factors of learning discussed in

Bransford, J.D. (1979). Human Cognition: Learning, Understanding and Remembering.  pp. 6–9, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

 

and,…

Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In Cermak, L.S., & Craik. F.I.M. (Eds.), Levels of Processing in Human Memory (pp. 429–446) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Henryk Marcinkiewicz, Ph.D., Director

Center for Teaching, Learning, & Faculty Development

Ferris State University

IRC 204

1301 S. State St.

Big Rapids, Michigan 49307 USA

(231) 591-3826

(231) 591-2914 FAX