See
Flashlight Online 2.0!

 

Flashlight Online log-in l About Flashlight Online l Handbook and Other Materials l ARQ l
F-LIGHT l Training, Consulting & External Eval.l Student Course Evaluation l FAQ

  Flashlight Online 2.0 home l Flashlight Online 2.0 Features l Schedule l PricesStudent Course EvaluationFAQ

 
Tutorials and Archived Demonstrations Example Surveys
  • Simple matrix survey developed at CSU Sacramento to evaluate workshops (click here to learn about matrix surveys). Note how this version of the form, for a workshop on WebCT, differs from this version for a workshop on Microsoft Word.  The wording of each version has been altered to include the name of the workshop and of the instructor. Information on all their workshops was uploaded in batch form, automatically generating response forms for each. Data on all workshops flows to the same database, making it easy to analyze workshops separately, or in any  combination.

  • One way to use matrix surveys is to study innovations that are used different ways in different settings. Once the matrix survey itself is designed, the instructor who wants feedback from students would fill out an online form, specifying which activities are important and what his or her students call the innovation. For this class's feedback form, the innovation under student is the personal response system (e.g., "clickers" or polling systems). The instructor calls the innovation "clickers" in this class and wants feedback on their use for peer instruction. The same matrix survey produced this very different feedback form for a different class, whose instructor wanted feedback on whether to use the results as part of students' grades (so student responses wouldn't be anonymous); this class referred to the technology as a 'polling system' as you'll see.

  • Another way to use matrix surveys: IT departments and facilities operations can evaluate the effectiveness of classroom technologies (proof of concept). Matrix surveys are ideal for this purpose because a) each course meets in a different classroom, b) each classroom offers a different mix of features and facilities, c) the institution already knows what those features and facilities are. Using a matrix survey, the facilities program can ask each faculty member only about the courses he or she teaches, and only about the facilities available in the room used by that course.

  • Needs assessment for TLT Group June workshop on diversity, learning, and technology (note the use of rubrics and the options for respondents to add comments to their answers to multiple choice questions)

  • Needs Assessment to plan an ePortfolio Workshop at the University of Queensland (note the questions with dual rating scales)

  • Washington State University ran this contest for student ePortfolios; contest judges then used this Flashlight Online 2.0 online rubric form to evaluate each entrant.

  • Flashlight Online 2.0 is extremely easy to use, especially when you're converting surveys and other online forms from other systems. And you can improve your form while you're doing it.  Here's a PDF of the original item bank, developed in Flashlight Online 1.0, that faculty at subscribing institutions can use to get student feedback on barriers preventing students from taking part in online discussion.  And here's the item bank, as we've converted it for use in Flashlight Online 2.0!  In addition to being more attractive and flexible, 2.0 allowed easy insertion of comments fields. And we know that these comments often provide the most powerful and helpful part of the feedback.

 

One Columbia Avenue,
Takoma Park, Maryland 20912
Phone
: 301.270.8312/Fax: 301.270.8110  

To talk about our work
or our organization
contact:  Sally Gilbert

Search TLT Group.org

Contact us | Partners | TLTRs | FridayLive! | Consulting | 7 Principles | LTAs | TLT-SWG | Archives | Site Map |