Self-Studies: Education is not a Machine

 

Handbook and Other Materials l Asking the Right Questions (ARQ) l Training, Consulting, & External EvaluationFAQ

Previous Section: Factors Affecting Activities l Return to Self-Study Main Page l Next Section: Confronting the Dark Side

Even when the same faculty member teaches two sections of the same course, and has taught them for years, what students do and learn will differ.  Add clickers, or any other technology that increases options for faculty and students, and that variation will probably increase. So not only is education more unpredictable than the weather: technology use can increase that unpredictability by empowering faculty, students and administrators to do their own thing, enabling the institution and its people to interact more intensively with the outside world. The old Ivory Tower was comparatively simple and comparatively predictable in its isolation, but today is a different, larger, and more interdependent world.

That makes it more important, and more challenging, to do studies that help people understand their programs and how those programs might be guided. Focusing on activities (long term phenomena) rather than on technologies per se (more transient) will help. Taking a look at all the major factors influencing the technology should help, too.

The empowering role of technology is just one reason we emphasize unique uses perspective for evaluation, and not just uniform impact approaches. 

  • Uniform impact perspective: our evaluation focuses on goals and activities that are the same (in kind) for everyone. For example, all students do the same math homework in order to understand and learn how to apply the central limit theorem in calculus.

  • Unique uses perspective:  our evaluation focuses on the learning in some broad zone of relevance that is most importatn for each person involved.  At the start we assume that each learner, and each faculty member, has somewhat different goals and different capabilities, experiences different events (some accidental), is creative in different ways, and (for these and other reasons) experiences qualitatively different outcomes.

This section of the Flashlight Evaluation Handbook describes our suggestions for how to create studies that balance the uniform impact and unique uses perspectives.

Previous Section: Factors Affecting Activities l Return to Self-Study Main Page l Next Section: Confronting the Dark Side

 

PO Box 5643
Takoma Park, Maryland 20913
Phone
: 301.270.8312/Fax: 301.270.8110  

To talk about our work
or our organization
contact:  Sally Gilbert

Search TLT Group.org

Contact us | Partners | TLTRs | FridayLive! | Consulting | 7 Principles | LTAs | TLT-SWG | Archives | Site Map |