The TLT Group

  Overload,
Shared Governance & Productive Assessment

New Paradoxes (and Paradigms?)
for Higher Education


Resources for/from/about
OLI Workshop

Dangerous Discussions Initiative, Clothing the Emperor Series - December 7, 2005, 1pm Eastern

This Web page offers a starting place and resources for an online event about the role of shared governance and assessment under conditions of too much information and too many options for using information technology in higher education, with the dual goal of implementing practical results and developing useful policies.

Workshop Leader/Presenter


Richard A. Detweiler (Rick)
President
Great Lakes Colleges Association

Moderator/Host

Steven W. Gilbert

President, The TLT Group

Archive of Full Session
[Open in Internet Explorer only]

Back to top of page

 

Resources from/for Online Session(s)

Session I - December 7, 2005

Questions for discussion

1. Assessment Pressure
Why are we under so much pressure to carry out assessment these days? We have a long and distinguished history in higher education in the U.S. – often seen as the best in the world. It is taking so much time for so little apparent purpose.

2. Over-Tested?
Are we going to become like K-12, where we teach to the test?

3. More (over?)active boards?
It seems like Boards of Trustees are more invasive these days; with their business orientation they are putting all new demands on us.

Quotes from campus senior administrators

1. Because faculty members often worry that administrators have too much authority, they have a tendency to latch on to every possible decision, no matter how small, seeking to have maximum impact on those decisions, down to the microscopic level.  Often it occurs that faculty say “no” to something simply on the ground of who is making the decision and on what basis.  There is a fear of letting even the smallest matter go by, as if doing so will indicate weakness or an abdication of the faculty role.

2. It’s often a small subset of the faculty that engages in shared governance.  One-third of the faculty could attend faculty meetings, and it’s almost always the same people who attend.  A large proportion of the faculty refuse to participate in governance committees.  It’s less than ideal when you have only the usual suspects on the governance committees, investing enormous amounts of time, cycling in and out through the years.

3. Budgetary decisions are the levers through which a college’s core educational values translate into specific actions.  Virtually every institution has a budget committee… often these budget committees prove to be less effective than they might, however. The committee’s time too often gets consumed in considerations of minor matters, and a great deal of time may be spent getting new faculty members on the committee up to speed.  Sometimes the work of the budget committee suffers from the lack of a broader context for making decisions…” So much time is invested for so little purpose.

Back to top of page

Your Questions, Suggestions, Comments

If you have any questions or comments about this workshop, please contact Lisa Star at online@tltgroup.org

Please send your questions or suggestions for improving our online workshops - including topics or leader/presenters that you would like us to include.

Send to Steve Gilbert at: 
GILBERT@TLTGROUP.ORG

Back to top of page

 

Hit Counter  Reset at 0 11/1/2005

Back to top of page

  Search site:
  

Back to top of page

Faculty/Professional Development   TLT-SWG Highly Moderated Listserver Since 1994     Clothing the Emperor