Examples of how someone (faculty member, support staff,
librarian,...) can enhance community and connections among
students:
1. In large enrollment courses WITHOUT
committing very much extra time, money, or guilt; and
2. In
any size course, by using some kind of assessment.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
What
follows below are responses to a request for resources via
the TLT-SWG listserv.
For full text of original request, click here:
TLT-SWG-14
Click on any of the following links for the full resource
descriptions:
1) Emerging
Technologies Course Description from Clifford Layton of
Rogers State University
2) Creating Communities from Deborah Hutti of Lakeland
Community College
3) Personalized Notes from Georgeanne Cooper of University
of Oregon
4) Online Survey Tools Link from Andrea Han of Miami
University Middletown
5) Tech Tools from Randal Baier of Eastern Michigan
University
6) Group Project Suggestion from Arta Szathmary of Bucks
County Community College
7) Assessment Links from Medaline Philbert of Pace
University
8) Group Project Exercise Description from Thom McCain of
Ohio State University
9) Socio-Educational Networks from Gwen van der Velden of
University of Kent
10)
Ideas for Building Community from Shauna Schullo of
University of South Florida
11) Discussion Board Etiquette Site from Sarah Swart of U.
Detroit-Mercy
Back to Top of
Page/Table of Contents
1) Emerging Technologies Course Description from Clifford
Layton of Rogers State University
From: Clifford Layton [mailto:Layton@rsu.edu]
Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 12:13 PM
To: gilbert; TLT-SWG@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: RE: TLT-SWG-14: HELP Building Community &
Connections in Large Courses & by Using Assessment
Steve,
I will use one of my courses as an example with respect to
your below.
The course is called Emerging Technologies.
In the course, students explore new (or newly emerging)
technologies in two ways: by reporting on a technology of
choice (but with my OK required), and by showing evidence that
they have explored the technologies chosen by other students.
There is no text book used in the course.
Each report of a student includes a paper, a set of
PowerPoint slides, and a verbal presentation over the
Internet/web. Verbal presentations are facilitated based on
use of a text/voice chat (usually PalTalk), and use of
corresponding slides in a browser separate from the text/voice
chat environment. Sometimes the sessions are recorded and made
available online to interested students who can not attend the
presentation synchronously, allowing extension of community
and connectivity across time. A question and answer session is
part of each presentation session (usually at the end of a
presentation).
The community involved often includes students from both
online and onground sections in the same semester, extending
community and connectivity across space in a current
time-frame; the onground students do their presentations live
in class but also over the Internet/web, and the online
students do their presentations online only. Frequently,
papers and slides and recorded presentations from students in
semesters previous to a current semester are used in current
semesters, further extending community and connectivity across
time.
All of the above indicated is available to students in a
current semester at low bandwidth or above.
Cliff (Layton) (Rogers State University)
Back to Top of
Page/Table of Contents
2) Creating Communities from Deborah Hutti of Lakeland
Community College
From: Deborah Hutti [mailto:dhutti@lakeland.cc.il.us]
Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 12:34 PM
To: gilbert
Subject: RE: TLT-SWG-14: HELP Building Community &
Connections in Large Courses & by Using Assessment
Steven:
With our recent experience through the Illinois Online
Conference in conjunction with LearningTimes, we used two
ideas that may assist in creating community. First, we asked
all participants and presenters to send us a digital photo of
themselves and/or their favorite coffee mug, calling it "MUG
SHOTS." This activity was meant to create community and
connections among the group. It was simple, and only required
that participants/presenters had a digital camera available at
some point and could forward a photo. To our amazement, most
people sent something, and no two were alike. There were all
types of coffee mugs and photos, and this exercise spawned
communications among those participating. Easy, inexpensive,
and fun.
The other example of building community was the creating
and sending of our coffee break e-cards. We have had more
comments than we can list on the value of this particular
item. As most conferences have breaks, this card provided a
moment of comic relief or a pause in the online activity. To
me, it is easy to be lighthearted or funny in person, but it
is much more difficult to convey that same type of attitude
online. With the coffee break e-cards, we added a moment of
fun - intentionally - that seemed to resonate with the
participants.
I will find these two items and send you a link to both.
Hope this is what you were seeking.
Back to Top of
Page/Table of Contents
3) Personalized Notes from Georgeanne Cooper of University
of Oregon
From: Georgeanne Cooper [mailto:gcooper@uoregon.edu]
Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 1:57 PM
To: gilbert
Subject: Re: TLT-SWG-14: HELP Building Community &
Connections in Large Courses & by Using Assessment
1. One instructor here at the University of Oregon
acknowledges any birthdays in his large class group (250
students) each time the class meets.
2. We encourage our large class teachers to send email
notes of encouragement and support to everyone in class
periodically throughout the term. The notes can be generalized
feedback about a paper, test or assignment ("I've had a chance
to look over most of your papers and I'm seeing a common
pattern of misunderstanding which is.....), ("I'm about
halfway through grading your midterms and is gratifying to see
the evidence that you have grasped well the concepts we've
been working on so far..."), or tips and extra examples ("An
example that I think may help you understand________ came to
me as I walked back to my office after class. Here it is...")
("If I were preparing for this test, here are some of the
things I would be doing...")
Georgeanne Cooper
Director, Teaching Effectiveness Program
Academic Learning Services
University of Oregon
Eugene, Oregon 97403
Back to Top of
Page/Table of Contents
4) Online Survey Tools Link from Andrea Han of Miami
University Middletown
From: Andrea Han [mailto:hanan@muohio.edu]
Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 11:59 AM
To: gilbert
Subject: Re: TLT-SWG-14: HELP Building Community &
Connections in Large Courses & by Using Assessment
I'm not sure if this is the type of assessment you're
looking for but...
Until recently I taught online classes where students met
only once - if that. To help students get to know one another
and to encourage discussion, I always tried to use an online
survey tools (like
www.surveymonkey.com)
to create a "getting to know us" activity. The questions would
start out fairly mundane "What is your age?" "What is your
gender?" "What grade/subject do you teach?" but get more
personal "What is your favorite snack food?" "What's your
favorite TV show?" "If you could be any famous person, who
would you be?" Almost every time we'd have a hilarious or
unusual response that would create a flurry on the listserve,
but people would also see how similar they were to other
people in the class.
Hope this gives you some ideas!
****************************************************************
Andrea Han
Educational Technology Coordinator
Miami University Middletown
Middletown, Ohio 45042
(513) 217-4001
http://www.mid.muohio.edu
<http://www.mid.muohio.edu>
Back to
Top of Page/Table of Contents
5) Tech Tools from Randal Baier of Eastern Michigan
University
From: Randal Baier [mailto:rbaier@emich.edu
<mailto:rbaier@emich.edu>
]
S
I would suggest the Hugo Zemp recordings on Ocora of
hocketing Alpine
horns. You will not believe your ears, your friends will
stop singing
"Edelweiss, Edelweiss," even though that's Austria, and the
Heidi
Zeitgeist will be forever removed from their
consciousness!!
I don't know if this works as assessment, but I give them
GPS units and
have them spend a few weeks mapping the campus. First, they
need to
locate their homes using online USGS images, do the same
using their new
campus environment, and then actively map specific
locations. Rotate
teams and create online maps using ARCView. I think it
helps in building
community, perhaps even in an oddly reverse way as they
ask, "Now, why
is he having us do this?" Next year I think I will
explore GeoCaching.
Then I would hire an EdPsych graduate student to tell me if
it works or not.
Randal Baier
Multimedia Librarian
Eastern Michigan University
Back to Top of
Page/Table of Contents
6) Group Project Suggestion from Arta Szathmary of Bucks
County Community College
________________________________
From: Arta Szathmary [mailto:szathma@comcast.net]
Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 10:07 PM
To: gilbert
Cc: 'Arta Szathmary (BCCC)'; Rebecca Stevenson
Subject: RE: TLT-SWG-14: HELP Building Community &
Connections in Large Courses & by Using Assessment
Steve,
I have my students do a group project. Part of project is
to do a little research about careers involving technology,
but part of the hidden agenda I have is to encourage
student-to-student communication using discussion topics,
email, IM, telephone or smoke signals. I use these
"assessments" with both my Face to Face Class and my Distance
Learning Class. We are using WebCT as our CMT.
I am currently involved in one of the Faculty Institutes at
BCCC, this one on Outcomes Assessment. This Institute is
facilitated by Arlene Franklin, a member of our TLTR. There
are 6 faculty members in this session. As part of the
Institute, which meets 6 times throughout the semester, I must
complete 5 CATs ( Classroom Assessment Techniques). We are
using :Learner-Centered Assessment on Colleges Campuses by
Mary E. Huba and Jann E. Freed as the main text. We are also
referencing Classroom Assessment Techniques, A Handbook for
College Teachers by Thomas A. Angelo and K. Patricia Cross.
My current CAT, asks the members of the Team to start
communicate and hand in one assignment. All member of the
group will get the same grade.
Assignment: Collaborative Team Project Prospectus
Assignment Information
Maximum grade: 10
Due date: March 21, 2004
Collaborative Team Project Prospectus
Since this is part of your team project, only one member of
team need submit it. All active members of the team will get
the same grade recorded in the grade book. One member of the
team should become the "recorder" for this assignment and
submit it in a timely manner. I will post my comments in the
groups private discussion area.
Directions: The prompts listed on the attached file are
meant to help you plan your team project. Respond to each
prompt with a very brief, well-thought-out answer. Remember
that this prospectus is just a plan. You will almost certainly
change part of your plan, and you may even change all of it.
before you complete your project. So make your best
predictions and plans, but don't be surprised or concerned if
you decide to alter them later.
Brief project description (What do you plan to do?):
Project site/setting (Where and with whom will you work?
Please list active team members names here):
Major questions you hope to answer/ goals you hope to
achieve:
Products/results (What will be the measurable outcomes of
your project?):
Resources needed (What do you need in order to do an
excellent job?):
Calendar of component tasks (When will you complete each
part of the project?):
Your biggest concerns or questions about the project:
Back to Top of Page/Table
of Contents
7) Assessment Links from Medaline Philbert of Pace
University
: Medaline Philbert [mailto:mphilbert@pace.edu]
Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 2:15 PM
To: gilbert
Cc: '"Murdock, William"'
Subject: RE: TLT-SWG-14: HELP Building Community &
Connections in Large Courses & by Using Assessment
Hi Dr. Gilbert,
Your request was received by Mr. Murdock, my supervisor,
and was forwarded to me. We met at Pace's TLTR session on
Friday, March 12, 2004, and we spoke briefly during the break.
In addition to the requested link I sent earlier today,
here are a few more resources you may want to consult for
additional ideas:
Assessment:
Considerations for Developing Evaluations of Online
Courses,
http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v7n1/v7n1_achtemeier.asp
<http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v7n1/v7n1_achtemeier.asp>
Evaluating Online Instruction: Adapting a Training Model to
E-Learning in Higher Education,
http://www.ericfacility.net/servlet/com.artesiatech.servlet.search.SearchServlet?action=9
<http://www.ericfacility.net/servlet/com.artesiatech.servlet.search.SearchServlet?action=9>
, it's item #2; other means such as this link is fee base
http://www.edrs.com/members/ericfac.cfm?an=ED477023
<http://www.edrs.com/members/ericfac.cfm?an=ED477023>
Community and Connections:
Collaborative Online Learning,
http://www.webproject.org/collab.html
<http://www.webproject.org/collab.html>
Seven Principles of Good Teaching Practice,
http://www.agron.iastate.edu/nciss/kingsat2.html
<http://www.agron.iastate.edu/nciss/kingsat2.html>
Instructional Immediacy and the Seven Principles:
Strategies for Facilitating Online Courses,
http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/hutchins63.html
<http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/hutchins63.html>
Learning from Reflections - Issues in Building Quality
Online Courses,
http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/deubel63.htm
<http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/deubel63.htm>
The Personalized System of Instruction: Review and
Applications to Distance Education,
http://www.irrodl.org/content/v4.2/grant-spencer.html
<http://www.irrodl.org/content/v4.2/grant-spencer.html>
I hope these resources will be of some value to you.
Best of luck with your presentation and enjoy your visit
with your family.
Regards,
Medaline
--------
Web :
http://www.pace.edu/library
Back to
Top of Page/Table of Contents
8) Group Project Excercise Description from Thom McCain of
Ohio State University
From: Thom McCain [ mailto:thom@mccainlimited.com]
Sent: Mon 3/15/2004 12:07 PM
To: gilbert
Subject: TLT-SWG for distribution
Steve:
I taught a large lecture/practicum course where student
grades were largely dependent on their performance in group
projects. There were all sorts of tools to help them
collaborate, but the consequences of not working together was
a continual issue for everyone. Each member of each group
rated themselves and others according to two scales: did the
person carryout their responsibilities; did the person attend
group meetings etc. One of the issues that surfaced early was
a wide variety of student views regarding what was fair and
appropriate to those who did not "pull their weight." I've
attached a copy of the exercise we used early in the course to
help each member of each group understand the consequences of
not participating and to begin a dialog amongst themselves as
to how they would treat each other. This turned lively and was
1). inexpensive; 2) helpful in dealing with the practical
issues related to peer evaluation.
Thom McCain
Ohio State University
Assignment: First read the case below as an individual.
Prior to discussing the situation with your group members,
rank-order your responses as to your personal favored course
of action. Then respond to the following scenario as a group.
Try and form a consensus. Select the reason that most closely
reflects your neighborhood recommendation as to the course of
action.
The Case of the Woolly Wonks
The thing about the Woolly Wonks is that they are totally
dependent on one another for survival. It is one of the things
that makes them so attractive and so much fun to be around.
These furry little creatures have a very complex social
structure that includes rewarding clans for cooperation and
working together, and punishes them for lack of attention to
the needs of members of their groups, because of the inherent
interdependencies of their roles.
The Woolly Wonks, in order to survive the 3 months of
freezing temperatures, must burrow deep in the earth and wait
out the cold. Exposure to cold will result in their death.
There is a traditional way that they get ready for the long
cold winters. In order to gather sufficient supplies, gaggles
of Wonks work on separate tasks. There's a gaggle that gathers
food, a gaggle that gets the necessary medical stuff, a gaggle
for fuel, another gaggle that gathers board games and circus
riggings that can be constructed in the caves below, etc.
The three months that are spent underground are a lark, but
pale in comparison to the fabulous life of fun and frolic that
transpires the other nine months of the year.
A major problem has been discovered during the first week
of the subterranean life. The King Woolly Wonk has gathered
the heads of the gaggles responsible for provisions to report
a serious and life threatening crime. The fuel gaggle has
betrayed the clan. The stack of fuel that they pointed to with
pride is a phony. It is hollow inside and represents less than
one eighth of the fuel they will need to survive the winter.
The hip fuelers were so busy having a good time frolicking in
fall that they built a house of cards that now jeopardizes the
entire clan. They finished their work only at the last minute,
after all the other gaggles had completed their parts. There
was so much playing around that the seriousness of the task
was not understood and all the crosschecking and back-up
strategies that are so critical to successful teamwork were
apparently never undertaken.
The laws of the Woolly Wonks clearly state that behavior
that threatens the well-being of the clan results in death or
expulsion (the equivalent of death at this time of year). The
Woollies will have to reduce the space that they use in the
cave in order to heat enough space for survival of the rest.
The King has offered four choices to her council:
1. Turn the fuel gaggle out of the cave. They have betrayed
their fellow Wonks and, besides, it's the law. They will most
certainly die.
2. Build the new smaller space in the cave large enough for
everyone except the fuel gaggle. Allow the fuel force to try
and make it through the winter without any fuel.
3. There were seven member of the fuel force, but only two
of them actually built the fake piles. Send the truly guilty
parties out of the cave and let the others stay in the
restricted space. The others were gatherers and doing other
things, like checking and analyzing clan needs for fuel. They
were responsible only as accomplices and are guilty only of
not paying attention to what was happening.
4. Forgive them. They made a mistake and are truly
contrite. Messing up is a fact of life. Everybody deserves a
break.
Back to Top of
Page/Table of Contents
9) Socio-Educational Networks from Gwen van der Velden of
University of Kent
From: Gwen van der Velden [ mailto:G.M.Vandervelden@kent.ac.uk]
Sent: Tue 3/16/2004 5:48 AM
To: gilbert
Subject: Re: TLT-SWG-14: HELP Building Community &
Connections in Large Courses & by Using Assessment
Dear Steve,
I hope examples from Britain are acceptable to you, and if
they are, here are some taken from our extensive work on
student retention. At the core of it is the development of
what we call socio-educational networks, which you could
loosely translate as study groups, building not on the
straightforward social interaction that all humans need, but
on the development of a shared approach to study, peer based
self help and study goal based processes. We have found that
retention rates improve dramatically if these processes are
put in place, and on many occasions we use e-learning means to
support this.
The exact examples are mentioned below.
Kindest regards,
Gwen van der Velden
Head of the Unit for the Enhancement of Learning and
Teaching
University of Kent
Canterbury Kent
Great Britain
We ask students to take part in an online groupwork
session, whereby they have to design a plan for using 2
million pounds donated to the University by a benefactor
(Alumnus). There are other briefs, including setting up a
champagne and oyster company for business students, but the
main element is a fun brief. A remit is given for the type of
expenditure this has to be, and a plan must be designed within
three working days, ready fro presentation to senior managers
at the University. This happens entirely on line and groups of
six students have been set up in advance. They are not
introduced to each other, nor are they given much of a brief
on netiquette or good on line working practices. Part of their
OFF LINE assessment ultimately is to reflect on their working
practices and collaborate on a code of professional on line
study behaviour. At this stage the groups need to meet each
other off line, and this is where a lot of further building of
the socio educational network ta!
kes place. The codes of professional practice then are used
as their own guide for future on line work.
It is all very helpful in setting up students for active
independent, but reflective learning, and it quickly allows
them to start building up socio-educational networks.
Another medium for setting up socio educational networks,
on or off line, is to let students identify their own learning
and study styles (using some of the commonly available self
diagnostic tools) and have them find like minded, or a mixed
group of students, that they will be working with for the rest
of the term. It causes confusion and discussion, but sets the
students up straight away with their socio educational
network, and makes them take responsibility for their own
study progress. It certainly seems to do the trick on taking
young adults out of the 'hand holding' study culture they were
previously used to.
And finally, those students who have been unable to form
allegiances (which tends to be quite a small percentage), are
then particularly monitored as being at risk of failure, as we
have found over the years, that organisational and social
networking skills are indicators for possible retention
problems.
Clearly, this model is used for introductory purposes, but
a more serious brief could be given, that could be assessed.
In that case, we sometimes allow students part of the final
mark to self award within the group for particular
contributions of a single student, as long as feedback is
provided on the reasons for awarding the additional percentage
to a particular student.
One of the most straightforward ways of starting up
community-building is to allow a few minutes in the first four
lectures (if full frontal teaching is used) for students
whilst sitting in a lecture theatre, to introduce themselves
to the three or four people physically directly next, in front
and behind them, preferably just before a coffee break. Any
old ice breaker will do, to help students on their way to
socialising. It is too simple for words really, but it is
amazing how many students my student learning advisory staff
meet, who claim they never managed to introduce themselves to
others in their class group.
Still, it is cheap and cheerful, needs no preparation and
little time. Importantly, it works, as long as it is done in
the first year, first weeks, first classes.
I hope this is of use to you.
Gwen
Back to Top of
Page/Table of Contents
10)
Ideas for Building Community from Shauna Schullo of
University of South Florida
Back to Top of
Page/Table of Contents
11) Discussion Board Etiquette Site from
Sarah Swart of U. Detroit-Mercy
swartsa@udmercy.edu
Steve, here are some things we do that work:
We post a discussion board etiquette site:
http://adm6.udmercy.edu/~swartsa/teaching-learning/discussion.htm
We require students at the start of the program to participate
in a
"Learning Styles PreCourse":
It is called PERSONAL MISSION STATEMENT
It is a four step process--1. Use the Steven Covey Mission
Statement
Builder at
http://www.franklincovey.com/missionbuilder/ - then
copy/paste it to Word or PowerPoint;
2. Ask some career specific starter questions, like "what
appeals to me
about this field?" "How did you first get interested in this
field?"...;
3. Complete the VARK Learning Styles Assessment
http://vark-learn.com
and report at least three suggested study strategies for your
style; 4.
Post your results from 1, 2, and 3 in the discussion board.
Then in the first week of every course we have a getting
acquainted
discussion board. Here is a sample one:
Tell one interesting thing about yourself. What would your
best friend
say is your best trait?
We make it a practice to require one new thread with the
participant's
answers to the discussion question and two replies to other
students'
postings in order to get full credit. In fully distance
courses, we make
the discussion boards the participation grade. We have
developed a
spreadsheet to easily track a student's scores for discussion
boards. We
remind students that we only accept "insightful and
thought-provoking
statements" to earn credit for discussions. (No I agree's or I
don't
think so's...)
I hope this is what you are looking for.
Have some fun in Switzerland too.
Sarah L Swart
Director of Instructional Technology
University of Detroit Mercy
swartsa@udmercy.edu
Back to Top of Page/Table
of Contents |