|
Original
POD-NCSPOD Program Descriptions - PDF
"Academic Amateur/Respectable eClips" Quality Goal
POD Innovation Ideas Awards 1986-2007
Some Rights Reserved
Recording
Permission/Release Form
Samples of Links to Other Interview
Recordings
Poster
Sessions from
"Weaving Patterns of Practice"
2008 POD Network/NCSPOD Conference
October 22-25, 2008, The Nugget
Resort, Reno, Nevada, U.S.A.
The Professional and Organizational Development (POD)
Network, &
The National Council for Staff, Program and Organizational
Development (NCSPOD)
Titles, Links to eClips
Title of Session &
Duration
[Optional: Photos of Interviewees]
NOTE: The speed of
your Internet connection may cause
some delay when you first launch some of these files. You might
need to adjust the audio volume to a comfortable level. |
Descriptions of
Poster Sessions
Topic Area, Presenter(s), Abstract
|
|
Scholarly Teaching at the Unit Level
(2:34 Minutes)
 |
Professional
Development- Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL),
Faculty
Daniel Bernstein, University of Kansas;
Wes Dotson,
University of Kansas
We have applied the model of individual scholarship
to the teaching of entire programs or departments.
Departments identify goals for their program and
specify where students demonstrate an understanding
of those goals. Faculty members use a shared rubric
to identify how well students achieve program goals
and give feedback to the program. We present two
examples of unit portfolios generated with
graduate student writing partners. The individual
scholar model functions with entire academic units. |
|
Digital Case Stories for Faculty Development:
Whose Story? Whose Development?
Tom Carey (4:44
Minutes)

Brett Christie (2:02 Minutes)
 |
Instructional
Development- Faculty, Learning and Teaching
Tom
Carey, University of Waterloo
Jeannie Cheng, San
Francisco State University
Brett Christie, Sonoma
State University
Wai Mei Fang, San Jose State
University
Tasha Souza, Humboldt State University
Digital case stories for faculty development combine
faculty storytelling with course artifacts and
interactive resources. This requires collaboration
between the faculty storyteller and other
team members with expertise in faculty development
and digital media especially for stories shared with
other institutions for faculty development). This
poster/demo will demonstrate case stories for
faculty development on topics such as First Day of
Class, Universal Design for Learning, Integrative
Learning and Course Redesign. The poster presenters
will share experiences about creating digital stories
with faculty, including emerging issues concerning
the partnership between faculty authors, faculty
development experts and digital media specialists.
[SW#2 VID5 4:44]
|
|
Road to Success—How a Teaching Center Helps
New Faculty Thrive (2:45 Minutes)
 |
Instructional Development — Learning and teaching,
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)
Yu-Jen Chiu, National Taiwan University;
Wen-Shya Lee, National Taiwan University
This poster presents a series of activities that a
teaching center inane Asian Research I university
conducts to assist new faculty with future success
in the early stage of career. The series of events
consists of New Faculty Orientation, a Mentorship
Program, and routine workshops and seminars. This
presentation will show how a teaching center
functions with respect to new faculty professional
development in the National Taiwan University
context. We invite an exchange of
institutional experiences and practical suggestions
for effective implementations in helping new faculty
thrive in their academic career. |
|
Building
Community in SoTL: A Disciplinary Society Faculty
Development Program (2:49 Minutes)
 |
Instructional Development — Scholarship of Teaching
and Learning (SoTL), Educational Research.
Alix Darden, The Citadel
The American Society for Microbiology (ASM) has a
long standing commitment to providing educational
resources and tools that foster professional
development of its educator members. In 2005
AS initiated a three-year pilot program, the ASM
Scholars in Residence, ASMSiR, program, which is
designed to have significant impact on faculty and
their communities, in science education reform,
through the scholarship of teaching and learning. The
poster will focus on development of the program and
outcomes based on three cohorts of scholars.
|
|
Small Colleges Comparison
of Teaching Centers across the Country (1:54
Minutes)
 |
Organizational Development —
Educational Developers
Wesley Dotson,
University of Kansas
As part of a 10-year review and self-study process,
our advisory board asked us to place the University
of Kansas Center for Teaching Excellence into the
context of other teaching centers across the country.
Several comparisons were made along dimensions such
as: center size, funding sources, audience served,
and types of services and programs offered. In
addition, an analysis of websites and programs
offered was done to identify interesting or
informative website features and programs. Seventeen
centers who shared information are included in the
results. The poster will summarize the findings and
offer discussion of interesting programs and
website features.
|
|
Weaving Perceptions in ITA
Testing and Training (1:32 Minutes)
 |
Organizational Development —
Marketing, Development
Cheryl Ernst, Southern Illinois
University Carbondale
For over 25 years, International Teaching Assistants
(ITAs) have been the focus of numerous research
studies. One area that has been lacking is a
comparison of the testing and training processes
from the perspectives of the administration, the
ITA-hiring departments, and the ITAs themselves. This
poster session shares the results of a study that
qualitatively evaluated the testing and training
process at large Midwestern university to identify
areas of miscommunication and inconsistencies with
the aim of improving communication across
campus. This session will be useful for those
involved in the testing and training process of ITAs.
|
|
Using SoTL
Inquiry to Connect High School and University
Teachers (2:57 Minutes)
 |
Professional Development — Scholarship of Teaching
and Learning (SoTL), Program Evaluation
Peter Felten, Elon University
Katie King,
Elon University
Ben McFadyen, Elon University
This poster describes a new program that brings
together high schoolteachers and university faculty
to conduct collaborative year-long scholarship of
teaching and learning (SoTL) research projects.
The eight high school teachers and eight university
faculty in the program's initial cohort are exploring
shared questions about student learning, leading to
new insights and improved teaching at both the high
school and college level. The poster will feature
the work of the program's participants, and will
present evidence of how this collaborative approach
changes the SOTL research process by weaving
together
insights into student learning from teachers and
faculty.
|
|
Taking Faculty Evaluation Online (and International)
(4:26 Minutes)
 |
Organizational Development —
International, Large Institutions
Jake Glover,
Fort Hays State University
Leaf Yi Zhang, University
of Florida
This poster covers an in-progress case study of the
transition from paper-based to web-based student
ratings of teaching. It discusses research
foundations for the proper use of student ratings in
faculty evaluation and how change creates opportunity
to realign institutional mindsets on how "we've
always done it." This case study also entails the
paper to web transition in a Chinese partner school
and the poster explores Chinese higher education
culture regarding faculty evaluation and the efforts
required to weave this context into the
American university paradigm.
|
|
Designing and Assessing
Effective Cross-Campus and Community
Collaborations (3:52 Minutes)
 |
Instructional Development — Scholarship of Teaching
and Learning (SoTL), Faculty
Kimberly Green, Washington State
University
At Washington State University, we are exploring
three-way partnerships across campus and community,
supporting SoTL work-in-progress using
portfolio
thinking and technology. We've designed electronic
SharePoint environments which offer
structured reflective assignments to a) promote
thinking, questioning, and integration of ideas, and
b) document students' process and progress. The
environments have built-in assessments which provide
rich timely feedback to faculty and other
collaborators, allowing them to make adjustments,
build on student perceptions and address challenges.
This approach has recently facilitated two
multi-partner collaborations: Honors College,
Libraries, and CTLT; Education, public school,
and CTLT. We've woven much together and raised new
questions.
|
|
Enhancing Faculty Collegiality with a Continuum of
Teaching/Learning Support (2:28 Minutes)
 |
Organizational Development —
Faculty, International
Laurie
Hatch, Ohio University
Martin Tadlock, University of
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Increased economic pressures on colleges and
universities raise significant challenges not only
for maintaining educational access and academic
standards, but also for collegial relationships
within the academy. This poster presentation
addresses how faculty development programs and
initiatives can enhance the collegial environment
for both full-time and adjunct/part-time faculty with
a continuum of teaching and learning support.
|
|
Access to Success: A
New Mentoring Model for Women in Academia
(2:30 Minutes)
 |
Instructional Development —
Faculty, Learning and Teaching
Amber
Dailey-Hebert, Park University
Emily Donnelli-Sallee,
Park University
Jean Mandernach, Park University
Research has shown the importance, particularly for
women, of receiving mentoring in the academic
profession (Castor, Caldwell, &Salazar, 2005). Those
women who do remain in the academy through the
tenure
and promotion process may have difficulty finding
mentors oriole models in academic leadership
positions (Kaplan, 1995; Cawyer, Simonds, & Davis,
2002). With the dwindling number of women
remaining in the profession, and fewer achieving high
level positions of leadership, this lack of women
leaders in academia influences the policies,
procedures, and expectations set by institutions
(Cullen &Luna, 1993). This poster session addresses
ways to support women faculty in defining and
pursuing leadership excellence.
|
|
English-mediated
Classes in Non-English Speaking Countries: Policy
and Pedagogical Concerns (2:44 Minutes)
 |
Professional Development —
Professional Context, Career Stages
Cho Hee, Korea
University
Meena Hwang, Korea University
Younghae
Park, Korea University
John Sager, Korea University
This poster examines the English-mediated classes
(EMC) in non-English-speaking countries both from a
policy point of view and with pedagogical
considerations. As higher education institutions try
to internationalize their programs, many universities
in non-English-speaking countries have adopted EMCs.
We will examine the cases of Finland and the
Netherlands, Hong Kong and Singapore, and will
present Korea University in particular to review the
policy, faculty development activities, and the EMC
Certification process. The study will bear
significance in that the same exact program may be
used for assisting foreign faculty members in
universities of English speaking countries.
|
|
Supporting
Blended Learning on Your Campus (5:06 Minutes)
 |
Instructional Development — Learning and teaching,
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)
Jane Holbrook,
University of Waterloo
Donna Ellis, University of
Waterloo
How can we help faculty members adopt purposeful
blended learning approaches in their courses? Come
and experience our Instructor Resources Repository to
learn about one method that you could use on your
campus. As part of our course management system, we
have been collecting online learning activities that
our faculty members caner-use and re-purpose for
their own courses, and have organized them according
to common instructional challenges that instructors
face. The repository includes activities that are
more pragmatic than learning objects and has helped
us to introduce faculty members into the world of
blended learning.
[SW#2 VID7]
|
|
Graduate Teaching Assistant Peer Mentors as Agents
of Institutional Transformation (5:20 Minutes)
 |
Organizational Development — Graduate Teaching
Assistants (GTA), Large Institutions
Cassandra Volpe Horii, Harvard
University
The Carnegie Foundation's recent study of PhD
programs reports that major outcome is the
pervasive importance of "intellectual
community." While we know that teaching is important,
the questions of who can more effectively integrate
it into the PhD, and how, remain. Based on
assessment
data from a program employing graduate students
as department-based peer mentors on teaching, our
data (surveys, interviews, and reports from faculty,
administrators, and graduate students) suggest that
peer mentors capitalize on their positions
as marginal authorities within departments to
facilitate improvements in Carnegie's measures of
strong intellectual community (e.g.,
meaningful faculty-GTA interaction, departmental
teaching culture).
|
|
Large Institutions Keeping up with
the Jones's: Using Emerging Technology in
Teaching (1:54 Minutes)
 |
Organizational Development — Graduate Teaching
Assistants (GTA),
Thomas Janke, Indiana University—Purdue
University Indianapolis
Megan Palmer, Indiana
University—Purdue University Indianapolis
Genevieve
Shaker, Indiana University—Purdue University
Indianapolis
Is it worth keeping up with technology? Remember,
good teaching is good teaching, and technology is
merely a tool. But, what possibilities exist within
tools like wikis, blogs, and podcasting to enhance
student learning? For example, as communication
methods and channels evolve, can these tools provide
opportunities for students to explore how to express
their learning in multiple genres? During
this session we will share and engage in discussion
about the ways we have used instructional technology
to enhance face-to-face, hybrid and fully online
courses. Finally, students' self-reports of the
impact obit on their learning will be discussed.
|
|
Comparative Study of GTA Development in
Japan and the U.S. (I:49 Minutes)
 |
Instructional Development — Learning and
teaching
Naoshi Kira, Japan Professional
School of Education
This poster explores the differences in the systems
and training programs for graduate teaching
assistants (GTA) in universities in Japan and the
U.S. based on a comparative study. In the U.S.,
each university decides how GTAs are trained and
utilized, but in Japan, the Ministry of Education
plays an important role. Japanese universities
started using GTAs in 1992, supported by public
subsidies and regulated by some guidelines from the
Ministry, but GTAs have not been fully utilized yet.
Participants will learn about the differences
between
the university-led and government-led GTA systems
from international perspectives in the context of
faculty development.
|
|
Serious Games and
Deep Learning: Is It Possible? (3:53 Minutes)
 |
Professional Development — Graduate Teaching
Assistants (GTA), International
Sally Kuhlenschmidt,
Western Kentucky University
Barbara Kacer, Western
Kentucky University
Have you wished the level of persistence and
enjoyment aimed at videogames was directed to
learning? How do games and educational activities
compare? How can teachers take advantage of games
for learning? Does technology make it possible to
infuse game-play more easily and consciously into
learning? Learn about:• the nature of serious
games,• the advantages and challenges of using
serious games, and• resources for creating games for
learning.
[SW#2 VID6 3:53]
|
|
Weaving Well Prepared
Adjunct Faculty into the Instructional
Culture (4:28 minutes)
 |
Professional Development —
Faculty, Educational Developers
Richard Lyons, Faculty Development
Associates
Michael Dabney, Hawaii Pacific University
Adjunct faculty members provide colleges and
universities potential scheduling flexibility and
increased curriculum potency. Many however are
initially ill-prepared to manage the array of
expectations of their students, administrators and
colleagues. Although most institutions provide
insufficient support for their part-timers, growing
number of institutions have installed an array of
preparatory and support initiatives to meet their
needs. These include structured orientations, courses
in basic teaching and course management
skills, mentoring, and recognition practices for
exemplary work. This session highlights best
practices from an array of institutional types,
and the results that have been achieved through those
practices.
|
Role of Faculty Development in Designing a
Mission-based Student Ratings Form (Ed Nuhfer & Bob
Bleicher - 4:25 minutes)
 |
Instructional Development — Learning and
Teaching
Edward Nuhfer,
California State University—Channel Islands
Bob
Bleicher, California State University—Channel
Islands
We produced a reliable and beneficial summative
rating form based heavily on CSU-Channel Islands'
Mission Statement. Our unconventional campus
emphasizes student-centered active learning
and interdisciplinary education. We hire faculty for
their academic qualifications and their likelihood to
support these signature attributes. We opted to
create our own student ratings form based upon the
latest research and our unique needs. Faculty should
own their evaluation system, but developers can play
crucial roles as communicator, manager, resource
person and co-worker in designing summative ratings
forms with faculty. Student ratings forms,
foremost, should accurately reflect what an
institution asks faculty to do.
|
|
Research on Engineering Learning and Teaching:
Implications for Engineering Education (Jim Borgford-Parnell
-
3:21 minutes)
 |
Instructional Development — Science, Technology,
Engineering, Math (STEM), Educational Research
Jennifer Turns, University of Washington
Jim Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington
Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington
For the past five
years researchers with the Center for the
Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) have
studied engineering students and faculty. This
interactive session is designed to familiarize the
audience with results from two strands of this
research and to guide participants in
collaboratively identifying implications for
engineering teaching and faculty development.
[Not listed as a poster session?] |
|
Improving Graduate Student
Advising With an e-Portfolio (2:49 minutes)
 |
Professional Development —
Faculty, Small Colleges,
Laurie Richlin,
Charles
Drew University of Medicine and Science
In this session, the presenter will describe how a
Faculty Learning Community (FLC) is developing an ePortfolio to facilitate graduate student advising.
Poor graduate student advising has been shown to
be a
leading cause of student drop-out and lengthy
time-to-completion. During 2006-2007, members of two
FLCs investigated graduate advising and conducted a
survey of graduate students and graduate
faculty members/advisors. Members now are working
with individual academic programs and students to
develop Learning Matrices to create a graduate
student ePortfolio using Sakai. This session will
provide the background (including challenges) of the
development of their work.
|
|
Disability as
Diversity: Successful Strategies for
Instructing Students with Disabilities (5:58
Minutes)
 |
Organizational Development —
Educational research, Faculty
Kelly Roberts,
University of Hawaii
Kathleen Kane, University of
Hawaii
Robert Stodden, University of Hawaii
This poster provides specific research based skills
and strategies for faculty to use with students with
disabilities. Many of the strategies benefit all
students. These include:
•
universal instructional design strategies;
• strategies for working with
students who use assistive technology;
• strategies for working with
students with hidden disabilities including
psychiatric and learning disabilities;
•
integrating accommodations into the classroom; and
• making the classroom and learning
environment accessible. [SW#2] |
|
Fostering Diversity through the
Arts (4:52 Minutes)
 |
Professional Development —
Diversity, Faculty
Amanda Ryan, University of San Diego
Sandra
Sgoutas-Emch, University of San Diego
Academic excellence requires a learning community
that mischaracterized by inclusive engagement with
diverse groups of people. Successful organizations
seek to provide structures that enable collaboration
and provide the means to gather and discuss
different and marginalized perspectives. This poster
session will show how faculty development center
and a network of professors and artist educators from
the greater city community created opportunities
on campus to explore multicultural literature and
performing arts; twill also demonstrate how the
programs facilitated conversation among students,
faculty, staff, administrators and community members
about the complexities of gender and race.
|
|
Institutional Context FD Map: A
Conceptual Map on Faculty Development
Programs (4:30 Minutes)
 |
Organizational Development — Assessment &
Evaluation
Hiroaki Sato, Ehime University
Tayo Nagasawa,
Nagasaki University
Hidehiro Nakajima, Meijo
University
The purpose of this poster presentation is to show a
conceptual and structured map of faculty development
(FD) programs in Japan. Since all institutions of
higher education were mandated to conduct systematic
FD in 2008, various kinds of programs have been
developed and implemented in Japanese universities.
We gathered the 123 programs in 12 universities and
categorized them with the chart which we called Map.
It provides us with a reflective framework.
Participants would find it useful as a scale for
program evaluation and a map for supporting the
career development of faculty members.
|
|
Evaluation Assessment: Can
Universities and Technical Colleges Learn from Each
Other? (2:30 Minutes)
 |
Organizational Development —
Faculty, Program
Yvonne Shafer, Minnesota State Colleges and
Universities
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system
is the fifth-largest system of two- and four-year
colleges and universities in the country, based on
student enrollment. This session highlights project
sponsored by the Center for Teaching and Learning
within the system. Faculty and staff from state
universities, state and private colleges, and
clinical internship sites collaborated to develop
an assessment method that aligns medical/clinical
laboratory technician competencies for measuring
students' performance against predetermined
standard of acceptable performance. The poster will
be useful for those interested in helping others
establish collaborative assessment method for
programs where the goal is mastery.
|
|
Extending the
Classroom into the Community: Community Lecture
Presentations (2:05 Minutes)
 |
Instructional Development —
Faculty, Educational Developers
Alice Stephens, Clark Atlanta
University
An effort to improve student learning outcomes in a
critical analysis course entitled, "African American
Images in the Media" required students to create and
deliver a community lecture presentation on atopic
related to the representation of African descended
people in themes media. The effectiveness this
requirement aimed at was deepening the students'
comprehension and understanding of course concepts,
and strengthening critical thinking skills was
compared to an earlier version that did not include a
service-learning component. The opportunity to
interact with community audiences may be an
important and necessary component to mastering very
dense and unfamiliar course content.
|
|
The Doctor is In (2:42 Minutes)
 |
Catherine Wehlburg, Texas
Christian University; Mike Theall, Youngstown
State University
[Not a
"regular" poster session!] |
|
Back to Top |
|
|
Samples:
Other Web Pages that Display Links to Video & Audio
Recordings of Interviews
1.
Poster Session
Interviews: 28th International Lilly
Conference on College Teaching
2.
Interviews:
Compassionate Pioneers - League CIT 2008
3.
Interviews: Compassionate Pioneers - Various
Locations, Media
4.
Interviews: Categories of Diversity - League CIT
2007
Generic Permission/Release Form 2008
Back to
Top |
|