|
Dangerous Discussions:
|
||
|
This Web page offers a starting place
for civil, constructive conversations about the changing ways in which
people identify themselves as they communicate online, with the dual
goal of implementing practical results and developing useful policies. Web pages CANNOT be enough by themselves for these purposes; but we hope that this one can be a valuable resource when used effectively in workshops and other collaborative activities. |
|
|
||
|
I. Describe the Dangerous Discussions
issues in the least inflammatory language and identify important
pre-requisites and conditions and the stakeholders. What are the risks and benefits? How can we take advantage of the latter and avoid the former? What are the educational conditions under which anonymity can be most useful? Under which anonymity should be avoided? What are the potential risks and benefits of
students' participating anonymously in course work or classes? [Including the
use of anonymous response tools for traditional classrooms - "Personal Response
Systems" and emerging hand-held device options - cell phones, PDAs, iPods, ...] Why bother? Under what conditions is it important to deal with this issue? Under what conditions should this issue be avoided? Under what conditions are the benefits associated with this issue likely to result? Are there any important pre-requisites that must be in place? Under what conditions are the risks associated with this issue too likely to occur - so that this issue should not be pursued or implemented? Who cares? (Who
should be involved in considering this issue? |
II. Restate polarizing views or questions in ways most likely to enable stakeholders who are initially committed to apparently opposing views to engage in civil, constructive discussion. 1. GAINS: What are potential
benefits of allowing or requiring students to interact anonymously within a
course? 2. RISKS: What are the
greatest risks of allowing students to interact anonymously within a course?
|
III. List desirable results
of participating in the Dangerous Discussions
activities for this issue.
1. Deflate the hype and defuse artificial disagreements
– restate the issue and challenge in more realistic and less inflammatory ways 3. More effective institutional policies: The college or university develops and implements new guidelines for the appropriate use of anonymous participation options within courses. |
|
Anonymity, Intimacy, and Identity There are many ways to structure a discussion about THESE ISSUES. There are almost as many different motivations and goals for addressing these issues as there are stakeholders in the results of the dialogue. Some approaches are more likely to facilitate civil and constructive dialogue. Others are more likely to bury opportunities for real solutions. We hope to help you minimize unnecessary acrimony
and maximize constructive give and take - to help you eliminate the flames,
reduce the heat, and illuminate the real solutions. |
||
|
Learn About TLTG ||
Events & Registration ||
Online Institute ||
Subscriptions ||
Resources ||
Listserv & Forums||
Related Links |
||
|
Faculty/Professional Development TLT-SWG Highly Moderated Listserver Since 1994 Clothing the Emperor |
||