The TLT Group
Home Page

Dangerous Discussions: 
Requirements - Essential Characteristics

Dangerous Discussions Home Page

These questions are intended to help you decide if you have a "Dangerous Discussion"
topic worth pursuing - and, if so, how. 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.  Why bother?    ...more
2.  Who cares?  Who is needed?      ...more
3.  What are the real options?    ...
more
4.  What helps or hinders?    ...more
5.  H
ow can technology help or hinder?    ...more
6.  How can we help?  How can we work together?  ...
more
7.  How, if at all, are the answers to the preceding questions unique
for your topic, situation, institution, or current conditions?


Please send your suggestions for improving this Webpage to
Steve Gilbert at GILBERT@TLTGROUP.ORG

Back to top of page

1.  Why bother?
Select issues that are significant and appropriate for this approach!

  • Is there a possibility of making or influencing decisions about this issue that will have a significant impact on many people? 

  • Is it likely that holding some respectful, inclusive, constructive discussions might make a difference? 

If the answer to either of the above two questions is "No," you need proceed no further! 
Don't waste your time.  [But what might change both answers to "Yes"?]

If the answers are "Yes," then:

  • What are some of the significant benefits that might result from respectful, inclusive, constructive discussions? 

  • What are some of the risks of holding these discussions?
     

Why bother with this issue at all? 
For some of the same reasons that emerge from answering the next two questions?

  • Why bother to use new technology, to support constructive change, to build community?  
  • Why bother to keep trying to improve teaching and learning... with technology?

Click here for many more examples of answers to "Why bother?"

Click here for "Fundamental Questions" activities that will help identify and prioritize your Dangerous Discussions Issues

Back to Top of Page

2.  Who cares?  Who is needed?

  • Are there several different categories of stakeholders who believe this issue is important to them? 
  • Are some people frightened, angry, frustrated, …about this issue? 
  • Do some of them avoid talking with others about this issue
    - except those likely to agree with them? 
  • Do some stakeholders expect to lose more than they gain
    by talking with those who disagree with them?
  • Who is essential to participate in useful discussions and their follow-up? 
    Who controls resources (budget, staff, ...) essential to make progress on this issue?
  • Any deadlines or crises?  When?  For whom is this urgent?
  • Who can facilitate, participate in or otherwise support useful discussions?

Back to Top of Page

3.  What are the real options?

  • What are the options already available that seem to
    have the greatest potential to benefit as many as possible? 

  • Do we need to develop additional strategies, resources, options? 
    How could we do so? 

  • How much time do we have to develop, adapt, use, assess, ...?

Back to Top of Page

4.  What helps or hinders?

  • What is getting in the way of making progress on this issue? 

  • Which obstacles are critically important?
    (MUST be overcome in order to succeed?)

  • What is helping?  Same or different in the future? 

  • Who can help recognize, understand, and influence important obstacles and resources? 

Back to Top of Page

5.  How can technology help or hinder?

  • Are there ways in which some applications of information technology
    and communications media are already getting in the way
    (or likely to get in the way) of making progress on this issue? 

  • What is helping? 
    Same or different in the future? 

  • Who can help recognize, understand, and influence
    important technology/media obstacles and resources? 

Back to Top of Page

6.  How can we help?  How can we work together?

  • Interpret “we” and “help” as broadly as possible!

  • What can a diverse group of stakeholders accomplish?  How? 

  • Do we have the time and the will to reach an accommodation that is
    beneficial for everyone involved?  How? 

  • Might some stakeholders be willing to accept something less than their ideal NOW
    in exchange for a commitment from others for some future benefit?

  • Is there anyone so obstinately committed to one option
    that any discussion will be a complete waste of time?

  • How can we avoid allowing any group - big or small - to "hijack" the discussion?

  • Guidelines, guidance about techniques, approaches, tools, ….? 
    What strategies, technology applications, and tools could help support these collaborative efforts?  How? 
    [Click here for some help, and we're always looking for ways to improve these resources!]

Back to Top of Page

Please send your suggestions to Steve Gilbert at GILBERT@TLTGROUP.ORG

 

Hit Counter  Set to 0 6/11/2005

Back to Top of Page

 


  Search site:

  

 

Back to Top of Page

 

Learn About TLTG || Events & Registration || Online Institute || Subscriptions || Resources || Listserv & Forums|| Related Links
 TLT Group News || Navigating This Web Site  || Corporate Sponsors || Home

TLT-SWG Highly Moderated Listserver Since 1994                         Faculty/Professional Development Program