











|

E-Newsletter for the Flashlight Program
SUMMARY OF MARCH 2002 ISSUE
To state the obvious (except that it isn't always obvious), to do a
study of a course a faculty member must first:
- Understand that it
can sometimes be worth the time and effort to ask a question (do a little study) before
deciding what to do next as an instructor. A significant minority
of faculty have difficulty imagining how to improve a course, other
than by teaching the course better. Using data to figure out how
to improve the course is not a possibility they can conceive. If asked
to advise a peer on gathering data to improve teaching, they'd give
advice to the peer on how to teach better, for example. If you ask
what sorts of data about their own students might help them figure out
how to improve the course, they may not understand your question
This essay is intended
to be ready by such faculty, and by faculty
developers who work with them.
- Understand the conceptual
difference between (1) a technology (e.g., e-mail), (2) the activity for
which it is used (e.g., giving students quick feedback on their
math homework) and (3) the resulting improvements in learning outcomes
(e.g., understanding the central limit theorem in calculus). For
studies intended to help the faculty member and students get more
leverage from technology in order to improve learning outcomes, the
study must pay attention to the activities making use of the
technology. Are they proceeding as hoped? If not, why not? The
importance of these three elements (also known as a "triad")
is explained in this narrated
slideshow.
We're trying to find good ways to help large numbers of faculty (and
administrators) understand these two core ideas. It's difficult to design
a useful study without these fundamental insights. Attached above are our best
efforts to explain these two ideas to people who don't already understand
them. We don't claim they're perfect. Far from it! Please let me know how we can do
better. If you like, please
feel free to use these materials in your own faculty development work; let
us know how they work!
The Flashlight collection of
tool kits, study packages, rubrics, tutorials and other evaluation
resources has probably quadrupled in scope since the last time you
looked. In contrast to our many free
resources, most of these resources are available (by site license)
only to subscribers. If your institution subscribes, in other words, all
its staff and students have free access to all these resources (plus
everything new, upgrades, etc. for as long as the institution subscribes).
In addition, Flashlight Online has been upgraded: it's even easier now
to use surveys created by authors around the world as a 'rough draft' for
your own work and to return the favor by publishing your own for their
use. Creating surveys that look just the way you want is now possible too:
your own logo, font, explanatory text between sections or at the end. And
its easier to use Flashlight Online to create sets of surveys for multiple
sections, or multiple courses. If you haven't seen Flashlight Online in
the last month and your institution would like to consider subscribing to
the Flashlight Network or Tool Series Plus in order to get it, send e-mail
to flashorder@tltgroup.org .
Thanks to
a generous grant from WebCT, Flashlight
has developed a study package to help institutions assess and improve
their use of course management systems. The study package is
designed for use with all such products, commercial and home-grown (not
just WebCT). The beta version of this study package can be used to improve faculty
development, course development services, and technology support.
If your
institution subscribes to Flashlight OR uses WebCT, please
contact us if you would like a copy of the beta version of this study
package. And if you'd like help in beginning to use it, come to our
workshop at the WebCT users conference in Boston this July.
We
continue to collect studies
that colleges, universities, corporations, schools and others may have done of
their uses of such Course Management Systems (CMSs),
especially studies at the departmental or institutional levels.
We've begun to assemble
and annotate the studies we've found. Not many so far: we need your
studies and suggestions! Here are the kinds of studies
and instruments in which we are most interested:
-
Studies and instruments
designed to document how an institution's system has been used, how it
hasn't been used, what kinds of support and training were successful or
unsuccessful, and what factors affect the system's use for different
purposes.
-
Surveys,
focus groups, data collection by the CMS's themselves, and other means of
investigation.
-
Studies that produced
findings that were seen as useful by the institution (e.g., helped to
confirm or alter arrangements for training or support; helped confirm or
alter decisions about what CMS to use).
-
Studies
that helped document whether the system was of educational benefit to
students, departments or the institution as a whole.
-
Studies of the obvious and
hidden costs (including time) of maintaining such systems.
If you have done such a study
could you please send us a copy or a URL? We'd
also like to talk with you about whether or how you might improve the study
design.
If you know of such a study,
could you tell us how we can find it?
P lease send your information
and suggestions to Steve
Ehrmann.
P.S.
The TLT Group also has other
resources helpful in choosing a Course Management System.
We're excited about a webcast on Tuesday April 2 at 2pm
ET on helping your institution's provost focus on the best ways to use
technology to advance your institution's educational mission. It
resumes the popular series of webcasts, moderated by Steve Gilbert, that
drew hundreds of participants earlier this year.
Help us continue to develop a set of useful issues,
questions, myths, and recommendations about teaching,
learning, and technology for Chief Academic Officers. Register
for the Webcast, complete a brief survey, see
the latest version of the list!
This first free webcast of the new series is entitled,
"Issues for Chief Academic Officers (CAOs): From
Hair-Pulling to Reflection?"
The webcast features Steven W. Gilbert and Stephen C.
Ehrmann of the TLT Group. It's sponsored by The TLT Group and Horizonlive,
which has generously supplied the webcast service.
It's free, but registration
in advance is required on the Web.
Please help us today
by completing a 3
minute online survey about
issues of importance for your institution's CAO.
(This is also your chance to see a product of the upgraded Flashlight
Online survey system. The upgrade made it possible for us to include
color, logos, explanatory text anywhere I wanted to put it, easy
reordering of questions, etc.)
Background readings: Within the framework of our Portfolio
of Strategies for Collaborative Change, we already provide
sample questions, myths and misimpressions (and a few
recommendations).
Finally, here's an early
version of the issues to be discussed in the Webcast.
Steve Ehrmann will run a day-long workshop on using the
new Flashlight study package to assess and improve the educational
benefits of using course management systems. The workshop
is at WebCT's user conference in Boston this July. We're grateful to WebCT
for its generous support of the development of this package, which can be
used to evaluate the use of any course management system.
Syllabus 2002: Preconference Workshop on
Using and Assessing Low Threshold Applications and Activities
Steve Gilbert and Steve Ehrmann
(a.k.a. "The Two Steves") will run a two-day preconference
workshop at Syllabus 2002 in Santa Clara, California
on "low threshold applications and activities". Hardware
and software (the applications) and ways of using them to improve teaching
(activities) that take so
little user time, and require so little institutional training or support, that they can spread rapidly
and widely. The workshop is for faculty members and, even more,
for people with responsibility for supporting improved teaching and faculty
uses of technology. Together we'll review and expand our catalogue of LTA's,
discuss how to assess needs for them and their use, and explore ways of
spreading their use even more rapidly. Syllabus 2002 runs July 27-31.
(Fascinating by the LTA idea and its potential for
helping all faculty use technology quickly to improve teaching? Can't wait
for Syllabus? Come to Jacksonville, Florida, April 10 for a one-day
workshop on LTA's.)
For more Flashlight and TLT Group events, keep
an eye on The TLT Group calendar.
By the way next week, on April 4, CREN will present what looks to be a very
interesting online event. Here's the CREN announcement.
"COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES AND STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING
AND LEARNING
A free, live, streaming audio interview
from CREN on
Thursday, April 4, at 4 pm Eastern time.
http://www.cren.net/know/techtalk/events/collab.html
CREN's guests on this topic are JULIE LITTLE and JOHN PETERS of
the
University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
"You might ask just "What is collaborative
learning?" John's program's website defines it as
"constructing knowledge collectively as people work, inquire, and learn
together based on a shared purpose."
"Join the CREN Tech Talk Co-Hosts, Howard Strauss and
Judith Boettcher
as they quiz our guest experts about the latest technologies to
enhance
and maintain collaborative learning."
CREN has been of great help to The TLT Group over the years,
and their online events are usually extremely good. I've posted this
particular event because the topic seems likely to be of interest to many
F-LIGHT readers.
Flashlight has been helping with the production of PT3-Now,
a video series on how colleges of education should be helping tomorrow's teachers
learn to use technology. Steve Ehrmann, director of the Flashlight Program, is one of the
four panelists in this ongoing series. The videos are periodically
available via satellite download and later may be available in hard copy;
contact the series
producers for more information.
Among our newer Network members: the Board of
Regents of Louisiana, Fairfield University, and the University of New
Hampshire. Currently, over 180 institutions and
projects subscribe annually to Flashlight tools/services. For an almost-current list of the
approximately 340 institutions and projects around the world that are
subscribers or licensees of Flashlight
tools,
please visit our list
of participating institutions.
Top
of Page
Michele Demarest has joined our
staff, working from the campus of Indiana University Purdue University
Indianapolis. We were approached several months ago by the Indiana University
system, asking whether we'd be interested in hiring a full-time Flashlight
expert jointly with them, working half-time for IU and half-time for TLT
Group. Michele, who started on March 4, is the result. In the coming months
she will be working mainly on projects in distance learning, nursing, and the
evaluation of Course Management Systems.
Have
a Question about Educational Uses of Technology?
Sometimes you just need a bit of help - a contact, an idea, a reaction. We try to be as
helpful as we can, so drop us an e-mail and
let us know what's on your mind.
About Flashlight
(including free demonstration accounts), the TLT Group, and F-LIGHT
(starting and stopping subscriptions)
The Flashlight
Program for the Study and Improvement of Educational Uses of Technology
is part of the non-profit TLT Group,
Inc. We're headquartered in Washington DC with staff in Texas and Indiana, and
Senior Associates around the world.
Our thanks to Washington State University for their many ways of supporting
Flashlight, including providing the listproc for distribution of F-LIGHT
notices.
We are also grateful to St. Edward's University and Indiana University for extensive support for Flashlight; to the
corporate sponsors of The TLT Group; and to funders whose dedication to
higher education has aided the TLT Group's work, including Annenberg/CPB,
APS, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the Fund for the Improvement
of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), and the National Science Foundation.
If
your institution needs to get a better look at Flashlight Online, the best way is for someone at
your institution to request a temporary, free demonstration account.
Send e-mail to Flashlight@tltgroup.org
with the header "Free Demo Account" to ask for details. One
account per institution, please.
The TLT Group publishes F-LIGHT every month or three. You can see the name of the
author-editor at the bottom of this message; please feel free to send me mail about issues
of evaluation or research on teaching, learning and technology.
If you know someone else who would like to be alerted to new issues of
F-LIGHT, please suggest
that they send e-mail to LISTPROC@LISTPROC.WSU.EDU with the one line message
SUBSCRIBE F-LIGHT (the subscriber's first and last name)
Do the same
for yourself if you have changed e-mail addresses.
To stop receiving the bulletin about F-LIGHT, please send e-mail to LISTPROC@LISTPROC.WSU.EDU with
the one line message
SIGNOFF F-LIGHT
Top
of Page
Number of visits to this page:
Stephen C. Ehrmann, Ph.D.
Director of the Flashlight Program and
Editor, F-LIGHT
The Teaching, Learning and Technology Group
Headquarters office hours: 10AM to 6PM Eastern
Directions to:
One Columbia Avenue, Takoma Park, Maryland 20912 USA
phone (301) 270-8312 fax: (301)270-8110
e-mail: online@tltgroup.org |