![]() |
Flashlight Case Study |
|
|
|
Method:
From the list of approximately 700 full-time faculty,150
names were randomly selected based on the number of
full-time faculty in each of RIT’s eight colleges. After a
relatively unproductive attempt to administer the survey
questionnaire by telephone, the faculty members in the sample
received a personalized email requesting that they complete an
online version of the questionnaire. This proved substantially
more productive than trying to reach them by telephone.
A total of 91 survey responses, roughly proportionate
to the size of each college’s full-time faculty, were
obtained of which 82 were useable Selected Findings:
The following findings are excerpted from a longer and more
comprehensive report. The most frequently
selected responses (90 % plus) to the question “What online
instructional techniques are you using this [Fall] quarter?”
were “email to communicate with students” and “word
processing to prepare materials for class.”
“Providing students with links to web resources”,
“Internet research assignments”, “smart classrooms”
were in the 71%-61% range as were “Accepting assignments in
electronic formats”, and a “class email distribution
lists”. In the middle range (44% and 37%) were “correcting
or grading assignments on line” and “web materials
developed specifically for the course”. Only 18% of the
respondents said they were using “Instruction in the use of
online data bases”, “online simulations and
experiments”, “electronic reserves”, “teacher
developed software”, “student online team work”,
“online discussion”, “online grade books”, “online
chats”, and “online quizzing and testing”. Most fascinating to F-LIGHT, the study revealed that faculty mostly learned to use online strategies on their own and with colleagues, rather than through workshops. In answering the question “How have you learned to use online techniques” respondents could select as many different techniques as were applicable.
What’s been done with
the finding? RIT
still offers workshops but Belle suggests that the university
focus workshops on types of learning, or types of faculty, for
which these informal approaches are less effective. The TLT Group has been working on the complementary front. Since faculty do learn mainly on their own, how can a college or university create an environment where such faculty self-taught learning becomes more productive, frequent, and fulfilling? For more on that, and the role of assessment and future research in guiding that process, check out this short paper. Steve Ehrmann, F-LIGHT
|
|
|
|
|
|
learn about tltg || events & registration || programs || resources || listserv & forums || corporate sponsors || related links || home |
|