Confusors

alias: http://bit.ly/confusors

Productive Assessment l Professional Development l Planning: Visions, Strategies l Boundary Crossing
LTAs - Low Threshold Applications l Nanovation Bookmarks l Individual Members Resources


This is the early, public version of our Confusor resource page.  To see, and contribute to, the
expanded resources on Confusors, your institution needs to be a TLT Group subscriber.

Confusors - Separated by a Common Language

If people don't realize they're using the same word or phrase to mean different things, the result can be an unnecessary argument. Our term for such linguistic traps is "confusors."

For example, two people might get into a bitter argument about regional accreditation of institutions even though they don't actually disagree, simply because they don't realize that each is using a different definition for "assessment." 

There are the two defining characteristics of a confusor:

  1. A term has more than one accepted definition (e.g., "teaching" can mean that an expert is explaining something, or it can refer more broadly to any action (or silence) of an expert that is designed to help someone else learn)

  2. Because people weren't aware that they were each using different definitions for that term, unnecessary arguments or confusion have resulted..

Most confusors are essential - we can't not use those terms - so it's essential to clarify definitions as we use them. A few confusors, marked in red below, are also confusing but are non-essential - personally we simply don't use these terms because there are less ambiguous ways to express the thought.

Using this page to prepare for, and facilitate, a 'hot button' discussion:  Confusors have no single 'correct' definition. First, ask people how they each define the confusor (e.g., through a survey) to see if there is unanimity.  If not, see if the group can readily agree on a definition for use in this particular discussion.  If they can't, remind participants that, as they each use the confusor, they will need to remind others of how they are defining it. The only goal is to understand and to be understood.

Meaning 1, 2 and 3 in the table: In the table below, the definitions we usually use at The TLT Group are in the first column ("Meaning 1").  Sometimes Meaning2 or Meaning3 are equally legitimate (e.g., for "assessment") while in other cases, we do not recommend these other definitions -we're simply reporting that we see them in wide use (e.g.,  Meaning2 of the word "course"). if it's a term we avoid using at all because the term is so likely to be misleading, the definition is in red.

The order of confusors in the table: The first set of confusors (lecture, teaching, course and active learning) are used frequently in discussions of education. The second set (assessment, evaluation, etc.) have to do with formal inquiry. The third set (campus, distance learning, classroom use of technology) are confusors that often have implications about the location of learners and learning.  The fourth set (beginning with "we/they/them") are confusors that can easily disrupt discussions of technology and education (and many other kinds of dangerous discussions, too.)

Your suggestions: Do you have confusors to suggest? or new definitions for the terms in our list? Go to this entry in our blog ("Two Steves and a Blog") and post your suggestion as a comment.

 Steve Ehrmann

Go to "Dangerous Discussions" home page.

Confusor

Meaning 1

Meaning2

Meaning 3

Learning
(Thanks to Jose Icaza at Tecnológico de Monterrey in Mexico  for reminding me that I'd missed this confusor!)

A visible activity (e.g., studying, listening to lectures, working on a project)

What's happening invisibly  in the person's brain during that process (meaning1) e.g., a misconception being confronted and being replaced by a different conception

The outcome of that process (meaning 2) e.g., mastery of a skill or body of knowledge. To avoid confusion, you may want to refer to meaning 3 as a 'learning outcome' or 'what the person has learned' instead of  'learning.'

Training

Synonym for education, but typically used for relatively brief or contained kinds of teaching and learning. This definition is most common in the wider world.

A form of education that emphasizes a) everyone should learn the same thing, b) acquisition of knowledge or skills without any emphasis on engendering wisdom or perspective. This definition is more common in universities.

 

Lecture

One-way communication (oral, images) from an expert to a large number of novices. Can occur in a classroom, by video, by audio, etc.

Anything  a faculty member does with students in a classroom

 

Teaching (as in "scholarship of teaching")

Any intentional activity that, directly or indirectly, helps someone else learn (example of indirect teaching: assigning a student to write a paper on a topic of personal interest, even if no further assistance or feedback is given)

Any intentional activity that directly helps someone else learn (e.g., coaching; writing a textbook)

An activity that occurs, by definition, only when the expert and the novice are in the same room. So any form of distance learning, no matter how effective, is not teaching.

Course

Teacher, students, materials and what happens among them. Each term, each "course' is unique because (at the very least) the students change. This definition is held inconsistently -- many people would agree with it, yet almost no "course evaluations" include assessments of the contributions of the students.

The materials used for instruction. This definition is implied by the question, "Who owns the course?" which is a question about control of  intellectual property, not about slavery.

Teacher and the materials the teacher uses (but not the  students) - implied when someone says, "I'm teaching the same course again this year."

Blended course (also known as "hybrid" course)

Nontraditional scheduling. Total time spent in the course remains the same as in typical classes. However, students are expected to spend more time on ‘homework’ (out of classroom) including online work. Fewer hours are spent in face-to-face meetings in classrooms. Most common motives: give students more time to do the work online; reduce the demand for classroom space; decrease scheduling conflicts that slow student progress to a degree.

Use of various technologies for complementary communicative/interactive purposes including classrooms, textbooks, and online tools such as course management systems, e-mail, and the web.

 

Active learning

A learning process can be defined as "active" if the learner is required to continually make decisions. For example, learning processes that involve assignments of writing, discussion, solving a problem, group work, or creating something are active learning processes.  Lectures are usually characterized as passive because the learner is not required by the situation to think critically or even to listen. 

A learning process can be defined as active if a learner is continually making decisions, whether or not the process forces the learner to do so. For example, a lecture can support active learning if the listener is continually (perhaps silently) questioning and interpreting the message - "why was that said?" "what are the implications of what was just said?" "do I believe what was just said?"

 

Interactive, Interactivity

Students  conversing online with faculty and other students ('interactive instruction')

Students using software that is designed for educational purposes and which responds differently depending on what the student writes or does, e.g., tutorials, online quiz, simulations

 

Theoretical - This confusor comes from Robert Badouin at l'Université de Moncton in Canada, who sits on his university's committee on teaching evaluation. "The topic often comes up prompted by students who complain that Prof X is dull because he's too theoretical."

A discussion using concepts and their association to explain a phenomenon.

A lecture that is abstract and does not present information related to the student's personal experiences.

A lecture discussing concepts unrelated to any wider contexts, personal or theoretical.

Evaluation - For more on 'dangerous discussions' about evaluation, see this page of 'frequently made objections.'

Intentional collection of information about a process in order to improve it or make a decision about it.

Intentional collection of quantitative information (whether that's appropriate or not)

Intentional collection of information by someone else in order to judge and perhaps penalize you.

Assessment

Measurement of what students have learned or what students can do

Intentional collection of qualitative information (e.g., students writing essays, interviews)

Intentional collection of information by you in order to advance your own agenda

Data

Any information used as part of an intentional inquiry. The results of an interview are data, for example. Photographs originally taken for another purpose but used in an evaluation are data.

Quantitative information - numbers. If the results aren't numbers, then they aren't data..

 

Culture of assessment

An institution has a culture of assessment if it's widely accepted that formal inquiry (studies; formative evaluation) is a valuable, typical way to improve practice and if such inquiries are in fact common, influential and beneficial at that institution.

Label for an effort by assessment enthusiasts to make assessment the most important activity at the institution, at the expense of all other activities and all other values.

 

Scholarship of teaching and learning (SOTL)

Intentional, formal inquiry by faculty members with their own students as subjects, designed to help them improve their own courses and, if the inquiry turns out to be  exceptionally successful, help their colleagues improve their own courses as well.   It is this last clause that distinguishes SOTL from course research. Unlike educational research, SOTL inquiry is not typically in search of generalizable findings. Any faculty member with a little additional training can engage in SOTL, no matter what the discipline of the faculty member.

 Other definitions are like the one to the left but vary in detail. For example some people insist that, to meet the definition of SOTL, an inquiry needs to be framed in terms of what other faculty members have found in their own inquiries. Some say that the activity needs to be exposed to the critique of colleagues, but need not a chance of being helpful to colleagues' teaching or inquiries,, in order to be considered SOTL.

Any kind of innovative work done by faculty that is heard about by colleagues and benefits them. (In our view this is an incorrect definition of SOTL).

Costs of education - for more how to study costs, see the Flashlight Cost Analysis Handbook.

Net costs of an activity (e.g., costs of a distance learning program)

Gross costs. (We've heard of a department that, when asked to cut costs, fired an adjunct who happened to be responsible for a good chunk of the department's revenue..)

Note: Some arguments include assertions such as "You can't run a program of that type with that small a budget" or "if they're getting that big a budget, they must be wasting some of it." Both assertions assume that any type of program has a 'normal' cost. Research says the opposite. See "Bowen's Law."

Distance learning

Any educational program that helps students learn even though they rarely or never see their instructors face-to-face

(ditto) but only if the barrier facing students is physical distance (as opposed to schedule)

(ditto) but done in a way that is inevitably inferior (less interactive, fewer resources for students, less faculty attention, larger course sizes)

Distance learning (cont'd.)

(ditto) but only if the students use two-way video

(ditto) but only if students use the Web

 

Campus

A large contiguous physical space where an institution has many buildings, where faculty have offices, where there are classrooms, etc

Institution

When meaning 1 and 2 are combined, the implication is that all the important resources of the institutions are on the campus: (just) resident faculty, (just) the books in the library, etc.

Campus, learning on (comparison with distance learning)

When compared with distance learning, 'campus learning' is assumed to be highly variable, including possibility of large or small classes, passive or active students. If distance learning outcomes are found to be the same as campus outcomes, this might mean that both are bad, both are mediocre, or that both are great.

When compared with distance learning (see above), 'campus learning' is assumed to be ideal (all small classes, rich discussion, labs, etc.). If distance learning outcomes are found to be the same as campus outcomes, then distance learning must be very good.

 

Technology

Any tool, resource, facility etc. that's used for some purpose, along with what's known about how to use that tool, resource or facility to achieve that purpose

Computers and computer-related devices

Any tool, resource, or facility that is, for the person involved, unfamiliar, risky and/or expensive enough that the person is continually conscious of it. For many people word processors and cars are not technologies because they can easily use them without continually being aware of them.

Classroom use of technology

Use of "technology" (q.v.) in a physical classroom

Any use of technology associated with a course, even when used in a dorm room, library, or workplace to do homework for that course

 

     
eLearning
Any use of computer-related technology to enrich or extend education Distance or hybrid courses with online components Distance learning courses with online components

Integrating technology into the course (or classroom) (why not say 'using computers in a course' or something more specific?)

Any use of technology in a course, ranging from PowerPoint slides to a course that has been totally redesigned, with new goals, new content, and new ways for students to study.

 

 

Delivery of instruction (why not say 'teaching and learning', 'education' or 'organized learning' instead?)

An approach to education that relies mainly on materials and one-way transmission of explanations from experts to learners. "Delivery" implies that clear explanations result in effective learning.  Goes with the assumption that education can usually occur completely effectively if the learner reads, hears, or watches instructional messages.

Any way that students learn.

Any way that students learn if they're off-campus

Asynchronous - This confusor comes from Ann Martin at LCO Ojibwa Community College
 

Conversational exchanges in which the lag from one comment to the next is typically measured in minutes, hours or days, not seconds. E-mail exchanges are an example of asynchronous interaction. Contrast with
"Synchronous interaction" where the lags between comments are measured in seconds or less. Face-to-face conversations, telephone calls, and most chat room interaction are synchronous.

The course does not begin and end with the usual semester start and end dates. (Editor's note: this definition is unusual in my experience, but I've heard it in more than one place. I'm tempted to discourage the use of 'asynchronous' for this purpose. Is there another term for courses that where students begin and end at the same time, but not on the calendar common to most other courses at that institution?

 

Information literacy

"The set of skills needed to find, retrieve, analyze, and use information. Information literacy is more closely tied to course-integrated instruction but it extends far beyond coordination between the reference librarian and the individual faculty member." (ACRL)

Teaching students how the basics ('literacy') of how to use the library as well as how to use specialized online and other digital resources available from the library. Unrelated to the rest of the curriculum unless the faculty member invites someone from the library to provide a quick briefing or online tips.

 

"Flashlight"

Name of an organizational unit that is part of The TLT Group

Flashlight Online, a web-based, multi-institution survey system and library developed by the Flashlight Program in collaboration with Washington State University.

An approach to developing evaluations, assessments, and other inquiries that has been developed in part by the Flashlight Program (e.g., a "Flashlight study")

We, they, them, etc.

In any 'dangerous discussion,' it's important to learn what others mean when they say "we" (as in "we decided that ..." or "they (as in "they won't let us ..."). 

 

 

(time)

In discussions of technology development projects, time can be a confusor.  When a developer mentions a capability of a technology under development (e.g., this system can do "x"), you need to clarify whether the capability already exists and is reliable, whether it exists only in a test form, or whether the developer expects the capability to become available real soon.

Jose' Icaza of ITESM in Mexico points out that "always" can be a confusor when two people agree (or disagree) about something that students 'always' do: all students? all the time without exception? or might one person mean that 50% of students do this 50% of the time?

 

Please send suggestions for this page to Steve Ehrmann

 

Some Rights Reserved:  "Share it Forward" Creative Commons License by the TLT Group, a Non-Profit Corp.

PO Box 5643,
Takoma Park, Maryland 20913
Phone
: 301.270.8312/Fax: 301.270.8110  

To talk about our work
or our organization
contact:  Sally Gilbert

Search TLT Group.org

Contact us | Partners | TLTRs | FridayLive! | Consulting | 7 Principles | LTAs | TLT-SWG | Archives | Site Map |