|
What are the best practices for student course
evaluation? Do they apply equally to classroom
and on-line evaluations? What should we keep in
mind in order to develop and sustain reliable,
valid, useful, and accepted evaluation systems?
Is one data collection approach superior to the
other? What are the characteristics and
relative advantages and disadvantages of each?
What are the critical institutional
considerations beyond the mechanical (i.e., the
paper vs. electronic) question? How can
evaluation data from both sources be best used?
This series of workshops explores online student
ratings within the larger context of faculty and
course evaluation. Emphasis will be placed on
best practices and how online student ratings
fit into the larger institutional and research
contexts. Participants will explore best
practices in the use of student ratings and see
examples of how these principles can be applied
in practice. They will also have the opportunity
to receive feedback on specific challenges or
questions they have about student ratings at
their institutions
Session 1—Best Practices in Student Ratings
·
Good practice in student ratings is (largely)
independent of context
·
Good practice in ratings can not ignore context
·
Evaluation and assessment are similar, not the
same, but both essential
Session 2—Online Student Ratings
·
Overview of online ratings use across the US &
elsewhere
·
Some advantages of online student ratings (i.e.,
why people might be interested in implementing
online student ratings)
·
Issues/challenges related to online student
ratings and ways to address these challenges [We
could collect issues to address beforehand from
participants. Some possible issues are below.]
·
Successes—what is working well
Session 3—Uses of Student Rating Results and
Related Considerations
·
Use of results for faculty and course
development
·
Use of results for research on teaching and
teaching improvement
·
Program and outcomes assessment, implications,
and actions
All of the TLT Group’s online offerings include
use of “low threshold” tools, examination of
controversial issues, participants with a range
of experience, and suggestions for assessment as
you integrate what you’ve learned into your
repertoire. |